Re: RIPE, DNSEC and "the test"

On 4 May 2010 18:16, Richard J. Sexton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is anyone else running a private root server bothered by Ripe's test that seems
> to ignore this, presming a problem where these is none?
>
> http://www.coconutoil.com/research.htm
>
> Oops. Wrong link. Read it anyway.

Apocryhal/Reciprocal link:

     http://www.sivglobal.org/?noframes;read=118

[ The fuel of the future ..  :o)   ]

> http://www.securecomputing.net.au/News/173412,warning-why-your-internet-might-fail-on-may-5.aspx
> http://is.gd/bTTVr
>
> --
> Richard J. Sexton  [email protected]  +1 (206) 333-1798 skype: rsx11s
> http://rs79.vrx.net http://mbz.org http://killi.net http://aquaria.net

Why? Is there a fire that needs to be put out? ;o)

Regards,


Chris.

~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~

16 mbz.org:
203 bytes, 1+1+5+1 records, response, noerror
query: 16 mbz.org
answer: mbz.org 172555 16 \032I\040vote\040for\040xxx\040to\040run\040.org
authority: mbz.org 172323 NS ns1.vrx.net
authority: mbz.org 172323 NS ns.ndc.vrx.net
authority: mbz.org 172323 NS rd.vrx.net
authority: mbz.org 172323 NS mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
authority: mbz.org 172323 NS ns1.quasar.net
additional: ns1.quasar.net 123 A 199.166.31.3

~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~

16 rd.vrx.net:
174 bytes, 1+1+4+2 records, response, noerror
query: 16 rd.vrx.net
answer: rd.vrx.net 3600 16 \015v=spf1\040a\040-all
authority: vrx.net 172149 NS mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
authority: vrx.net 172149 NS ns.ndc.vrx.net
authority: vrx.net 172149 NS rd.vrx.net
authority: vrx.net 172149 NS ns1.vrx.net
additional: mejac.palo-alto.ca.us 318 A 192.147.236.1
additional: rd.vrx.net 172778 A 199.166.26.51

~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~