Re: DJBDNS vs BIND
Paul Theodoropoulos <[email protected]> Wed, 05 May 2010 00:10:21 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/4/2010 11:32 PM, Allen Schultz wrote: > I was wondering what the (dis)advantages in using DJBDNS over BIND? > > Can you please shed some light into this? a few that come to mind: if you're familiar with BIND and comfortable with its zonefile nomenclature, it can take a little time to wrap your brain around the entirely different semantics of djbdns. I put off switching to djbdns for a couple of years after it came out, dreading learning a whole new way of doing dns. however, once i decided to make the switch, it took me perhaps an hour, maybe an hour and a half, to grok it. in retrospect i wish i hadn't been so timid. i much prefer the djbdns nomenclature now. lower adoption compared to BIND means fewer sysadmins out there whose brains you might pick if you run into a problem. that's a theoretical disadvantage, at least. it's very rare the mailing list doesn't come through. that said, with installations of BIND numbering into the millions (i would guess), there's no shortage of expertise in BIND out there. low interest in the code by the author. a few bugs and shortcomings to the code have been identified over the nearly a decade since 1.05 came out, but djb appears to have better things to do, which is his prerogative, but it would certainly be nice to perhaps see 1.06 someday. however, the code's public domain now, so there are assorted forks, and of course patches have always been available. it's a very minor disadvantage - since the code tends to just work, fixes are minimal. pushback. since BIND's included with virtually every distribution of every unix and unix-like OS out there, there's also no shortage of people who believe that BIND's part of the OS, and that using something else is risky or foolish. this can be no small disadvantage in some circumstances. that's all i can think of off the top of my head, though i'm sure there's others. > Also, I'm not seeing any unsubscribe information in the list's > e-mails. Is this by design or can I suggest that we move to put that > information in the e-mails from the header of this message, which you can view by clicking the "show original" button in gmail (as that's what the header says you mailed out from) Mailing-List: contact [email protected]; run by ezmlm i just sent a blank message to it, and received a helpful message advising how to unsubscribe. -- Paul Theodoropoulos