Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:53:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.bind.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11. 12. 25 9:34, Veaceslav Revutchi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 5:29 AM Darren Ankney <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Veaceslav, >> >> I am able to resolve rawbank.cd using BIND 9.20.16: >> > > Thank you, Darren, I see what you mean, using a local root does make a > difference, I suppose that glue becomes more trustworthy. > > I was looking more for an explanation of why I was seeing different > results on the three bind platforms, all supposedly patched for the > CVE. The reply from Petr@ISC clarified it for me in the sense that the > fix may be broken on that one system and I may need to follow-up with > redhat. > > If I wanted to work around the poor setup at the root for ".cd" I > understand I have options. FTR the cd TLD delegation in root was fixed to avoid the cyclic dependency and thus it cannot serve as a test vector anymore. -- Petr Špaček -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list.