Re: Delegate NS for subdomain

Todd Lyons <[email protected]> Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:09:24 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.network.dns.bind9.dlz
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Николай Шуляковский
<[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
> And not correct answer from NS server:
> dig NS gorodok32.ru @ns3.agava.net.ru
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> NS gorodok32.ru @ns3.agava.net.ru
> ;; global options:  printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 62459
> ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;gorodok32.ru.            IN    NS
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> gorodok32.ru.        7200    IN    NS    ns2.mamba.ru.
> gorodok32.ru.        7200    IN    NS    ns1.agava.net.ru.
> gorodok32.ru.        7200    IN    NS    ns1.mamba.ru.
> gorodok32.ru.        7200    IN    NS    ns2.agava.net.ru.

This tells me that there is something wrong with the query that bind
dlz is building.  Show your DLZ config.

> Where bug?

As a test, I delegated a DNS sub-zone on my test DNS server.  It
attempted to recurse to the nameserver I had delegated it to.  I am
_relatively_ sure that it will work properly, though I've never had to
need to use it in production.  Again, if we can see your query (we've
already seen your data), maybe we can find why it's returning the data
in the wrong places.
-- 
Regards...      Todd
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second,
it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Bind-dlz-testers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bind-dlz-testers