Re: DNSVIZ errors
akritrim® Intelligence™ via bind-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.bind9.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | akritrim® Intelligence™ |
| Message-ID | <b0d8cddef1b31cf9e271670625dc4c10__20353.1473221787$1745204775$gmane$org@akritrim.net> |
Thank you for your help. it does give insights into the problem. if you check dnsviz history, this does not happen everytime. the bind version is BIND 9.20.8-1+0~20250416.117+debian12~1.gbp1ea9dd-Debian obtained from: https://www.isc.org/download/ —-> https://bind.debian.net/bind there are no firewalls or load balancers. these are directly connected to internet. i was running BIND 9.18 official debian package and got no errors like this. On 21/04/2025 4:46 am, Crist Clark wrote: > The version of BIND and where you got it would be a good start. Any > load > balancers, firewalls, etc. between the server and internet that might > touch > the DNS records? > > True DNSSEC gurus please check my math. > > DNSvis is correct. You're not sending the proper NSEC3 records. Like > the > RFC says, "It takes three to tango," or NSEC3 denial of existence. You > sent > two. For a name where two levels of label don't exists, > > l5tz4.1i89a.akritrim.net > > You should send back three NSEC3 records, > > 1) NSEC3 record that proves 1i89a.akritrim.net ( > 18QMAAOCT0HPNGCPD9MLONVAK13DS8HT) does not exist. > 2) NSEC3 record for akritrim.net (N1MI0QA6QNO2L00GAT0PE6PEGGHHI48P). > 3) NSEC3 record proving the wildcard, *.akritrim.net ( > 6L23GRBE4JIMA1A0G8DSBBUT32V6VCO1), does not exist. > > But you're not, you're only sending two, > > N1MI0QA6QNO2L00GAT0PE6PEGGHHI48P.akritrim.net. 600 IN NSEC3 1 0 0 - > QDO3A5R9G64L616H1K2FF3SUMFPPRV3J A NS SOA MX TXT AAAA RRSIG DNSKEY > NSEC3PARAM CDS CDNSKEY CAA > > 67QJN06FLKRQCT38S4FF08EP31NDRL8S.akritrim.net. 600 IN NSEC3 1 0 0 - > 6LPNNJIVL1267OV5QQSBFLMFIDHMHJ8P TXT RRSIG > > Those are two I'd expect to see for (2) and (3), but where is (1)? > > But it's weirder. For this name, > > ebzoq.ik7ub.akritrim.net > > You are sending three NSEC3, but one doesn't look like the right one. > You > should send, > > 1) NSEC3 record that proves 1i89a.akritrim.net ( > S2NOKIAA732BLNNSEMCJ8KV74H6ICUEP) does not exist. > 2) NSEC3 record for akritrim.net (N1MI0QA6QNO2L00GAT0PE6PEGGHHI48P). > 3) NSEC3 record proving the wildcard, *.akritrim.net ( > 6L23GRBE4JIMA1A0G8DSBBUT32V6VCO1), does not exist. > > But these get sent, > > N1MI0QA6QNO2L00GAT0PE6PEGGHHI48P.akritrim.net. 600 IN NSEC3 1 0 0 - > QDO3A5R9G64L616H1K2FF3SUMFPPRV3J A NS SOA MX TXT AAAA RRSIG DNSKEY > NSEC3PARAM CDS CDNSKEY CAA > > I559SEFHCJO35HED2LU4N68B44CA281V.akritrim.net. 600 IN NSEC3 1 0 0 - > KOGD0HOUD9R7BAB4LKQR2E9ALI57C7N0 A AAAA RRSIG CAA > > 67QJN06FLKRQCT38S4FF08EP31NDRL8S.akritrim.net. 600 IN NSEC3 1 0 0 - > 6LPNNJIVL1267OV5QQSBFLMFIDHMHJ8P TXT RRSIG > > The first and last are the same two we got previously and line up with > (2) > and (3). But we get this other one that doesn't line up with (1). But > what > I /think/ that might be is the record that would prove > ebzoq.ik7ub.akritrim.net (IAT39F3MSSGS2D4O255VNHB67V2GCNVI) does not > exist > in its place. > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 10:29 AM akritrim® Intelligence™ via bind-users > < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> i didn't specifically ask for your help. i don't know why you replied. >> yes >> i do need help but this doesn't mean i can read your mind. >> >> so let me know what 'bits' of information should i share that will >> meaningfully help me. ( this is equivalent to saying ' >> if you need anything specific let me know.') >> >> today language models are more context aware. >> >> and if you don't want to share what do you 'need' then leave it be, i >> don't want your help. >> >> >> On April 20, 2025 5:17:46 PM UTC, "Ondřej Surý" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> On 20. 4. 2025, at 17:57, akritrim® Intelligence™ via bind-users < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> anyways, if you need anything specific let me know. >> > >> >Well, I don't really need anything, you've asked for help here, not I. >> I've already told you what is needed, >> >you didn't follow my advice :shrug:. The bits of information you have >> provided are not sufficient to meaningfully >> >help you. >> > >> >Ondrej >> >-- >> >Ondřej Surý (He/Him) >> >[email protected] >> > >> >My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not >> feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. >> > >> > >> >> akritrim® Intelligence™ >> -- >> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe >> from this list >> >> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support >> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more >> information. >> >> >> bind-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >> >> -- akritrim® Intelligence™ -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users