Re: DNSSEC Validation not working
Mark Andrews <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.bind9.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BD9986CA-15ED-44A9-8F23-A2C1E17ACE66__8975.18893923319$1749245607$gmane$org@isc.org> |
-- Mark Andrews > On 7 Jun 2025, at 06:56, Darren Ankney <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > This is correct: dnssec-validation auto; If you use "yes" there, then > you must supply a trust anchor. Auto is the default. > > The only idea I have is this: > > zone "." IN { > type hint; > file "named.ca"; > }; > > You don't need this anymore. BIND 9.18 will automatically find the > root zones starting with built-in root zone data. I think it is > possible to break dnssec starting at the root with incorrect or old > data in the hint file. It cannot hurt anything to remove that. > > Thank you, > Darren Ankney > >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 4:40 PM Luca vom Bruch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> I run a server with Bind9.18 on Alma9. >> >> It acts as the nameserver for two domains. (with glue records from the registrar). >> >> DNSSEC is enabled but somehow outbound queries are not validated? Domains with dnssec do have the "ad" flag though. The local domains somehow dont have the ad flag. >> >> example: >> >> dig www.dnssec-failed.org +dnssec @localhost >> >> ; <<>> DiG 9.18.29 <<>> www.dnssec-failed.org +dnssec @localhost >> ;; global options: +cmd >> ;; Got answer: >> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 54441 >> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 >> >> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: >> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 1232 >> ; COOKIE: ab33b7cb2be017660100000068434ae5a046bf6060941c68 (good) >> ;; QUESTION SECTION: >> ;www.dnssec-failed.org. IN A >> >> ;; ANSWER SECTION: >> www.dnssec-failed.org. 6086 IN A 68.87.109.242 >> www.dnssec-failed.org. 6086 IN A 69.252.193.191 >> www.dnssec-failed.org. 6086 IN RRSIG A 5 3 7200 20250621145120 20250604144620 44973 dnssec-failed.org. 6aHzJob+AUdBOyR9aErfXgtSnfE/gdQhiz1wdoZJD0lLZwhOhcD2OjA0 ct6vQjUWkQtu6SGVhKvvNsWtI6KqFLdBUc3QbnlsO3/tDk3/Powl7gdV CRqnj7Ridxjwyk5xYPurcZA/6dJK48uAFZsR5hlLCxcZN9vplBhlU6jz +9w= >> >> I believe the answer should be SERVFAIL? >> >> This is my config, I have tried with "auto" and "yes". >> >> options { >> listen-on port 53 { >> any; >> }; >> listen-on-v6 port 53 { >> any; >> }; >> listen-on port 853 tls local-tls { >> any; >> }; >> listen-on-v6 port 853 tls local-tls { >> any; >> }; >> directory "/var/named"; >> dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; >> statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; >> memstatistics-file "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt"; >> secroots-file "/var/named/data/named.secroots"; >> recursing-file "/var/named/data/named.recursing"; >> >> /* >> - If you are building an AUTHORITATIVE DNS server, do NOT enable recursion. >> - If you are building a RECURSIVE (caching) DNS server, you need to enable >> recursion. >> - If your recursive DNS server has a public IP address, you MUST enable access >> control to limit queries to your legitimate users. Failing to do so will >> cause your server to become part of large scale DNS amplification >> attacks. Implementing BCP38 within your network would greatly >> reduce such attack surface >> */ >> recursion yes; >> >> dnssec-validation auto; >> >> managed-keys-directory "/var/named/dynamic"; >> geoip-directory "/usr/share/GeoIP"; >> >> pid-file "/run/named/named.pid"; >> session-keyfile "/run/named/session.key"; >> >> /* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CryptoPolicy */ >> include "/etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/bind.config"; >> }; >> >> logging { >> channel default_debug { >> file "data/named.run"; >> severity dynamic; >> }; >> }; >> >> zone "." IN { >> type hint; >> file "named.ca"; >> }; >> >> include "/etc/named.rfc1912.zones"; >> include "/etc/named.root.key"; >> >> zone "vom-bruch.com" { >> type master; >> file "/var/named/vom-bruch.com.hosts"; >> allow-transfer { >> 127.0.0.1; >> localnets; >> }; >> }; >> zone "eloi.at" { >> type master; >> file "/var/named/eloi.at.hosts"; >> allow-transfer { >> 127.0.0.1; >> localnets; >> 213.255.218.23; >> 2a00:98c7:1000:1300:6e4b:90ff:fe57:e7b1; >> }; >> }; >> tls local-tls { >> cert-file "/etc/letsencrypt/live/vom-bruch.com/fullchain.pem"; >> key-file "/etc/letsencrypt/live/vom-bruch.com/privkey.pem"; >> dhparam-file "/var/cache/bind/dhparam.pem"; >> protocols { TLSv1.2; TLSv1.3; }; >> ciphers "TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256"; >> prefer-server-ciphers yes; >> session-tickets no; >> }; >> >> statistics-channels { inet 127.0.0.1 port 8053 ; }; >> >> Any ideas? >> >> Thanks, >> Luca >> >> >> -- >> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list >> >> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. >> >> >> bind-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > -- > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users