Re: Significant memory usage
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.bind9.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CE643254-7EB7-4A61-BC38-DC7CCE1359B9__49812.9847039067$1749442355$gmane$org@redfish-solutions.com> |
Odd. I tried: max-cache-size 1717986918; and restarted and I don’t see anything in the logs about it. But I did when I used a percentage. > On Jun 8, 2025, at 10:02 PM, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: > > The 1.7GB is what the system is reporting. That’s why I asked as I’ve seen OpenWRT reporting weird or no values before. > > 171MB cache is little on a low side and negative effects from overmem LRU cleaning will going to hurt the performance. > > I would suggest to set a fixed size for the cache - 1.6GB-2GB should be more than enough for your purposes. > > Ondrej > -- > Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) > > My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > >> On 9. 6. 2025, at 5:45, Philip Prindeville <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Jun 8 21:34:08 OpenWrt named[8106]: /etc/bind/named.conf:42: 'max-cache-size 10%' - setting to 171MB (out of 1714MB) >> >> but no idea where the 1741MB that it is basing that off of is coming from. > -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users