Re: Significant memory usage
Carlos Horowicz via bind-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.bind9.user,gmane.network.dns.bind.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Apparently you have 295108 zones, maybe you can try one single rpz zone with all 295108 fqdn's like ..... 12724[.]xyz IN CNAME . 21736[.[xyz IN CNAME . ..... instead of one zone per fqdn, and see if the memory footprint changes (both VMEM and RES) Good luck! Carlos Horowicz Planisys On 01/07/2025 19:27, OwN-3m-All wrote: > >> Apologies if I misunderstood your setup. I’ve also encountered > memory issues in recent BIND versions — BIND 9.18.33 on Debian 12 is a > tremendous beast, capable of handling millions of QPS — but after > reducing logging (including DNSTAP) and disabling serve-stale, I saw a > significant improvement in both performance and memory usage. > > Sorry, there's 295,108 hosts I'm serving up as 127.0.0.1 (for ad > blocking). > > I zipped my entire /etc/bind directory (which includes all configs). > It's available to download here: > > https://dinofly.com/files/linux/bind/bind_config_9.20_out_of_memory_bind_9.18_fine.zip > > -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users