Re: Significant memory usage
OwN-3m-All <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.bind9.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK0ZC5WGLrrg95O206Dok_B5-CuopsrH9aoCqX+S2qyD5_ucyQ__44971.39809407$1751394835$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
No, I'm not asking you to prioritize anything. I'm just saying that previously valid and memory performant setups are not performing well on the newest versions of bind (using too much memory). I created this setup based on guides I found online. So, if this is not the proper way to do it, what is the proper way? I don't know much about RPZ. Is it as simple as creating a billion CNAME records as suggested by Carlos in one zone file? And, why is that more performant as opposed to creating thousands of zones? They're doing the same thing? -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users