Re: BIND doesn't listen to other loopback addresses

Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.dns.bind9.user
Message-ID <818b2a39-200c-4980-8540-a3dbba604979__7484.3480413378$1751807741$gmane$org@gmail.com>
On 7/6/25 12:48, Michael De Roover wrote:
> On Sunday, July 6, 2025 4:40:37 AM CEST Michael De Roover wrote:
>> Omit 127.0.0.53, like so:
>>
>> options {
>> 	listen-on {
>> 		192.168.0.155;
>> 	};
>> };
>>
>> Works fine for me using IP addresses 192.168.10.{4-6}, on Alpine edge. You
>> can keep v6 none. One of the more basic options that's expected to be
>> stable across all distributions regardless.
> 
> FWIW, 127.0.0.53 is allocated by systemd-resolved. In a context of BIND, you
> neither need it (BIND is already acting as a DNS server), nor even want it
> (due to conflicts when binding to the network interfaces). Chances are that
> either something in your system brought 127.0.0.53 in there by script, or that
> some (misguided) guide made you put that in there. When in doubt, that address
> does not belong there, and that's probably all there is to it.
> 

I already masked systemd-resolved.service (I don't have any use case for 
it, though). Instead, I create dummy interface with 127.0.0.53 address. 
Again that's my personal taste.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.