Re: mysterious failures/wrong-answers in reverse DNS lookup
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.bind9.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <258419.1753389136__3745.25599633984$1753389159$gmane$org@dyas> |
Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > This is consistent with dns64 being configured with a prefix of > 2607:f0b0:f::/96. Have you been playing around with dns64? Yes. I do use exactly that! I didn't connect that ::babe:f00d was within that /96 when I put my dns64 there. So this is a synthesized reverse name then. I didn't know that was done. Thank for solving this mystery. I can easily move my dns64 prefix. -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 487 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEERK+9HEcJHTJ9UqTMlUzhVv38QpAFAmiCmFAACgkQlUzhVv38 QpCupgf/TTl9F0Wet6lMynuK77jJoBLlLld3YwQhxTGzl26JREDr7Zoh53Q5RTBe tjmSUIrglOoHN8HVnAbfn9AkPXRVHXm58xvcSpcgEEZ5OppEcfYGMuZF4M/isg1n bX2HvjHRIeRNfHKQxHWhVeD7owzrsPalfe1GgNnEAAHRRnUBM4H1ncFp9q2Cuva1 bub/f/xTgZOyUvknEdKOPxwR8r8P30xWRYP2MX1SFEzVf33nXikN93PLh9uWgc/l t1zSrndLviMFGGLRsfsVPYlLGiD4Ly+sfa2WPjcOY/f6y/neRafjEnP9gk4YSzV9 IbGcvlNl4ZmszVJrhO7P7KkzfgbIPw== =qVPk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----