Re: IPv6 et résolution Bind
Firebolt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.french |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ok merci ca me rassure je pensais avoir un problème sur mon serveur pour les requêtes sur l'IPv6. Le 09/06/2011 10:06, Stephane Bortzmeyer a écrit : > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:32:39AM +0200, > Firebolt <[email protected]> wrote > a message of 23 lines which said: > >> DNS format error from 74.54.83.122#53 resolving probag.net/AAAA for >> client 127.0.0.1#43582: invalid response > BIND a raison, leurs serveurs ne répondent pas correctement aux > requêtes AAAA. > > % dig AAAA probag.net > > ; <<>> DiG 9.7.1-P2 <<>> AAAA probag.net > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 52364 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;probag.net. IN AAAA > > ;; Query time: 272 msec > ;; SERVER: 148.60.80.251#53(148.60.80.251) > ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 9 10:05:32 2011 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 39 > > > % dig A probag.net > > ; <<>> DiG 9.7.1-P2 <<>> A probag.net > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47320 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 3 > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;probag.net. IN A > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > probag.net. 3577 IN A 74.54.82.222 > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > probag.net. 172773 IN NS ns2.expireddomains.register.com. > probag.net. 172773 IN NS ns1.expireddomains.register.com. > > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: > ns1.expireddomains.register.com. 34 IN A 74.54.82.122 > ns2.expireddomains.register.com. 34 IN A 74.54.83.122 > > ;; Query time: 3 msec > ;; SERVER: 148.60.80.251#53(148.60.80.251) > ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 9 10:05:39 2011 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 150 > > >> DNS format error from 150.128.197.37#53 resolving marti.uji.es/AAAA: >> invalid response > Idem. > >> Si vous avez une piste sur ces messages :( > Il y a beaucoup de neuneus qui gèrent un serveur DNS. >