Re: [MaraDNS list] not fixed upstream after all
Nicholas Bamber <[email protected]> Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:27:14 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.maradns.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Periapt Technologies |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sam, Good luck with the job interview. On 07/12/11 17:54, Sam Trenholme wrote: >> I don't think include functionality in deadwood addresses the user's >> issue since he clearly needs it in the authoritative server. In any case >> the "execfile" documentation is quite hard to follow. > > I will add more documentation for "execfile" in Deadwood over the next > few days. It's been really hectic the last week; I had one job > interview Friday and am flying out today for another interview > tomorrow. I should be able to make time to document "execfile" better > this weekend. > > In terms of adding "execfile" support to the authoritative server, my > answer before I began accepting donations was "No, because UNIX [1] > already has a program called 'bash' that can do this. 'man bash' for > details." or "No, because MaraDNS has the /read directive that can do > this for zone files.". Now that MaraDNS' continued development and > support is user-funded, the answer is "No, because I currently don't > have enough funding to implement new features." (Note: I do manage to > get a job offer, I may no longer be able to implement new MaraDNS > features for reasonable sums of money. I will let the list know when > this happens). > >> This need not necessarily be an upstream issue. If your processing >> can handle running dpkg-reconfigure after updating the include file, >> then this could be accomplished with debconf. > > UNIX has a program called 'bash' that can combine multiple files in to > a single file. 'man bash' for details. :) > > - Sam > > [1] I understand that POSIX does not require that Bash be included > with a UNIX system. However, I can not think of a recent > implementation of UNIX that doesn't come with BASH (AIX and HP-UX are > legacy implementations, not recent implementations. I *believe* > Solaris comes with Bash these days; I *know* most Linux distros, BSD, > and Mac OS X do come with Bash). If you want to be pedantic about it, > just do a s/bash/sh/ig while reading this email. -- Nicholas Bamber | http://www.periapt.co.uk/ PGP key 3BFFE73C from pgp.mit.edu