Re: [MaraDNS list] MaraDNS update: Article has survived Wikipedia deletion attempt
Sam Trenholme <[email protected]> Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:40:39 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.maradns.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJxgfkSdnZKS_NGKAtTq0nuz77bkk3zOm6MartgNuGAoLfceqA@mail.gmail.com> |
>> Bradly, Bradly, my dear. TANSTAAFL. There ain=92t no such thing as a f= ree lunch. > > Yes there is. Let me word that differently: When money isn=92t passing hands, I have no obligation (legal, moral, or otherwise) to implement features in MaraDNS. I feel I had a moral obligation to finish Deadwood before declaring MaraDNS finished, which I did. I feel I have a moral obligation to patch MaraDNS against security bugs with CVE numbers. Beyond that, I don=92t see any moral obligations. > "If the whole of the bible was reduced to one single verse, that being > Leviticus 19:10 - then the bible would embody what I believe its > intended message was always supposed to be. I think it is better summarized in Leviticus 19:18 -- the one Jesus quotes in Luke 10:26-27. Anyway, that=92s about feeding the homeless. In the Biblical sense, the entire Internet and open source is a luxury and not needed to live. While we are on the subject of the Bible, I feel the biggest failure of Judeo-Christianity here in the early 21st century is being on the wrong side of history with regards to gay rights. > Deadwood is awesome. And tiny. And extremely durable too. You got that right. Just one point: Deadwood (and, yes, MaraDNS 1) was the only DNS server that has always been immune to the ghost domain attack that made the rounds a year ago (Jian Jiang; Jinjin Liang; Kang Li; Jun Li; Haixin Duan; Jianping Wu (2012), Ghost Domain Names: Revoked Yet Still Resolvable, p. 10) >> There has not been a single release or update to djbdns for well over >> a decade. > > I'm not going to talk about that product. I never liked it and > discussions as to the merit of it only begets flame wars ;) I will say this much about djbdns: When MaraDNS 1.0 came out, on June 21, 2002, there finally was an open-source alternative to BIND. I have little love for djbdns advocates; one of the very first emails I got when I announced MaraDNS development was a djbdns advocate who flamed me, telling me it was pointless to make a DNS server because djbdns was good enough. > I gathered that. It's the defeatist cynicism Agreed, actually. The path to prosperity is to look forward and think positive. Indeed, if you go to http://samiam.org, I don=92t even mention MaraDNS on my home page any more. As a former dot-com employee, seeing the dot-com party fall apart in the early 2000s was very disheartening. In a way, I was very lucky...I was still really young when I got my dot-com layoff. I wasn=92t get married or have a mortgage to deal with when I found myself on the street. Indeed, I had saved up some money in the bank and was able to go to Mexico for 4 months to learn Spanish, followed by returning to college to get my degree. After working in a Mexico for a few years riding out the post-dot-com crash as well as the big crash of 2008-2009, I finally was able to return to the US and get a good job again--not dot-com good, mind you, but pays enough to make the rent. I was able to get a good job because MaraDNS game me a strong enough reputation to find work. But, yes, the post-dot-com era made me very cynical. Something that, alas, sometimes comes out in my writings. > Sam, you do good work. You've created and published a wonderful product. > I wish I could do more for you at this time but I cannot. I hope my > sincere appreciation for your effort at least helps you feel > appreciated. As long as you're not hungry, a smile can go a long way :) Thank you for the kind words. I am proud of MaraDNS. And, I will not say "never". New releases of MaraDNS will continue to come out, and it's something I use every day to both resolve domains on the Internet (with Deadwood) as well as resolving my own handful of domains. - Sam