Re: NSD 4.1.18rc1 pre-release
Anand Buddhdev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.nsd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 16/11/2017 12:00, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote: Hi Wouter, > Packed structures are more difficult to access by the compiler. It is > likely that the compiler needs to generate more code to access members > in the data structure. The assumption that data is aligned in memory is > not there. The compiler will generate different code. Because it is > packed, it'll use less memory, but that code also has to be executed. I > don't know what the speed impact is, if any. Do you have a test server where you can compare the performance of NSD with and without this option? Specifically, can you measure how the CPU usage changes with and without this option, and also see how many responses per second NSD can push out? Regards, Anand _______________________________________________ nsd-users mailing list [email protected] https://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/nsd-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 898 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQJEBAEBCAAuFiEEmW/UuRJdDOvjJh4cFeCjJQzJKgUFAloNcegQHGFuYW5kYkBy aXBlLm5ldAAKCRAV4KMlDMkqBUddEAC5I3VM1spfSfx9Cf3G4M+Kc3T2RIYZK7Jz KhSEVrm+YiVF492zsqK3LCI2JNPHzxWvlGbOkauQCmZe7T7oTQ4LcC6UfMADEOrl bACs/uFk5gYEREhoIRjFWaWLMs+rsNNYmFZpD/yoFkL9LwiAEcFmZ37GXfx5z9bp MCrbcmu5dXbPFUmJq2nUEHbdU6SrRisQPcKXSvESJNSxK+/7jA8qPPwX0yv0kI/K kH4PQKdbpb8zb8slf+pB7bQHKM8wDXZFA1zJLpBVB+N/BUFEJSw3rKoPGc96aJ3K p3lO7JH0jz3UP78tvLWmMkVG6V5vfs8uvLSgPVIY5bhairScQuAW9GI/Z1c4lYdr RuUM79XOx06CVWmhgkzRl6+ZS85c83NDssDr3GsnA422ACh7Mwa7YUzYnYnb+J9e fTCe4n8iU1QpVkVrBKHiOKw9TsU+Q7Map15SesNObXDwfPYt1mysVPcxUJdPNaHh cNl6R/I8vNV6n3O0jKDOdJU6WkPBWChg277Dz1XwGrbzzO/zo+Dd3xoiTO2Aflr4 3ZzGVr/6BAcrxTXlu5t8eMwNkWpn2KBJ/jssZe0j/7cUxRMeIOYZekWOgRGkmy3W LTvu/50fP9gl72BU94bv7rd6IGNwuCVIDJPqH8PTeM8+xVHWcj/4yBx7WRnr66od P1yoc9Lwbw== =qvJ3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----