Re: NSD 4.1.24rc1 pre-release
"A. Schulze" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.nsd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 06.08.2018 um 13:29 schrieb Wouter Wijngaards: > NSD 4.1.24rc1 pre-release is available for download compiled without warnings and deployed on some lab systems... > It is possible to use nsd-control over a command pipe, without using > TLS, by setting the name of the control socket file. Access permissions > on that file then act as the access control. No TLS is used, because it > is not network traffic, and this is likely faster. the code try to identify the socket type by some assumptions -> start with '/' -> unix-socket -> contain ':' -> IPv6 address -> contain '.' -> IPv4 address It would be more clear and give more options if NSD wouldn't "guess". (think, somebody want to use a relative path ...) NSD (and unbound as well) could require sockets specified as "<typ>:<value>" postfix does this: unix:pathname inet:host:port ( host = ipv4 | ipv6 | dnsname ) sendmail does that: unix:pathname inet:port@host inet6:port@host but I'm also fine with the current implementation :-) > Also systemd support is added for readiness signalling. Enabled with > use-systemd: yes. I don't care about that software > Best regards, Wouter Thanks for NSD! Andreas