Re: CloudFlare NSEC black lies - any plans for support?
Cristian Seres <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:00:36 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.powerdns.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
21.07.2016, 13:02, bert hubert kirjoitti: > Hi Cristian, > > You mean NSEC3 narrow from > https://doc.powerdns.com/md/authoritative/dnssec/#online-signing ? Hi Bert, no, I mean the CloudFlare's solution that is rather different. According to the link I sent this approach has following benefits: - minimal information revealed, missing name \000 sent as the next name in NSEC reply and using NODATA, also no need for additional NSEC for the wildcard - prevents zone walking unlike NSEC3 which only makes it harder - the size of a negative reply is only a fraction of traditional NSEC reply I know about the NSEC3 narrow mode in PowerDNS. I suppose that's the best available option to decrease information leak at the moment. RFC7129 appendix B calls them "NSEC3 White Lies" which is more commonly used term than narrow mode, I think. With best regards, -- Cristian Seres _______________________________________________ Pdns-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-dev