Re: CloudFlare NSEC black lies - any plans for support?

Cristian Seres <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:00:36 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.network.dns.powerdns.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
21.07.2016, 13:02, bert hubert kirjoitti:

> Hi Cristian,
>
> You mean NSEC3 narrow from
> https://doc.powerdns.com/md/authoritative/dnssec/#online-signing ?

Hi Bert,

no, I mean the CloudFlare's solution that is rather different. According 
to the link I sent this approach has following benefits:
- minimal information revealed, missing name \000 sent as the next name 
in NSEC reply and using NODATA, also no need for additional NSEC for the 
wildcard
- prevents zone walking unlike NSEC3 which only makes it harder
- the size of a negative reply is only a fraction of traditional NSEC reply

I know about the NSEC3 narrow mode in PowerDNS. I suppose that's the 
best available option to decrease information leak at the moment. 
RFC7129 appendix B calls them "NSEC3 White Lies" which is more commonly 
used term than narrow mode, I think.


With best regards,

-- 
Cristian Seres
_______________________________________________
Pdns-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-dev