Re: dnsdist and udp-in-errors
Remi Gacogne via Pdns-users <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:24:09 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.dns.powerdns.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On 12/11/2024 17:15, janasowieso Nicht via Pdns-users wrote: > ... of course, please find the output of dumpStats() below, > in our statistics/graphs we couldn't detect anything strange or > noticeable, except the udp inerrors or "udp-in-errors". OK, at this point I would recommend: - lowering the amount of "addLocal" directives. I usually recommend having setting it to roughly half the number of cores dedicated to dnsdist, the other half going to the 'newServer' threads - looking at why you are getting UDP checksum errors, as if I'm not mistaken you are getting a lot of these which doesn't look good - checking if the CPU cores are not over-committed in the hypervisor, and ideally not crossing NUMA boundaries. The CPU steal metric looks OK, but still it makes no sense to be dropping so many UDP datagrams at such a low QPS rate. It looks like you are even dropping TCP connections (tcp-listen-overflows) which makes no sense either. Hope that helps, -- Remi Gacogne PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE1jAMq8v0abvjkuUDogjtT4r1hEYFAmc1wboACgkQogjtT4r1 hEYm+gf/bMdg+JLCCIIW3aqH90V0z7/voHvvTf4DMgB6ocp37VuTFoPol0xNmj27 mUGavHNdUGsj4VgPgEzXyy62UiBLv0/b+TAqBsk3hpdo0oDBnXVvydSFGdoA/hSU Zil3+n/irhU//Nz4i/FxdjGis4r/qklaS8Ge9P7nVHgv9q/LoEiuJMZedd69z9UB YN9XSfU93rgGRQuEGdYQeqxMMOa6CqMgwLtzqAyiDmwwOIypFud+i1RuTrynWWlF Chvbt3aQ2+yyyiiaMLg0pEjrFl0Vcu+4rL1oH+qQezWfXOLhkMn9eGs/2NCLsaBE Mk14idTmP5rS3wVYPIey3Qiwy4usfg== =cUqa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----