RE: 6.0b3 updates

"Darrell May" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.e-smith.devel
Message-ID <00a801c3aa61$8656f020$1716a8c0@station1>
> Install as usual, downgrading with --oldpackage if necessary. 

As mirrors now contain multiple rpm versions, this is a little unclear.
Going by the file dates, it appears you wish the following rpms to make up
the latest update.  Is this correct?  

dovecot-0.99.10-01es4.i386.rpm
e-smith-apache-1.0.1-01.noarch.rpm
e-smith-backup-1.12.1-02.noarch.rpm
e-smith-base-4.14.1-11.noarch.rpm
e-smith-domains-1.0.0-07.noarch.rpm
e-smith-formmagick-1.2.2-01.noarch.rpm
e-smith-ldap-4.10.0-02.noarch.rpm
e-smith-lib-1.14.0-07.noarch.rpm (*** downgrade? ***)
e-smith-openssh-1.10.1-01.noarch.rpm
e-smith-packetfilter-1.14.0-02.noarch.rpm
e-smith-portforwarding-0.2.0-02.noarch.rpm
e-smith-pptpd-1.10.0-02.noarch.rpm
e-smith-proftpd-1.10.0-02.noarch.rpm
e-smith-release-6.0-11.noarch.rpm
e-smith-rpm-1.3.1-01.noarch.rpm
e-smith-samba-1.10.0-03.noarch.rpm
e-smith-telnet-1.6.0-02.noarch.rpm
e-smith-test-1.0.1-01.noarch.rpm
e-smith-turba-1.3.0-03.noarch.rpm
e-smith-viewlogfiles-1.6.0-02.noarch.rpm
iptraf-2.5.0-3.i386.rpm
mod_ssl-2.8.12-3.i386.rpm
netatalk-1.6.3-1es0.i386.rpm
openssh-3.7.1p1-1es4.i386.rpm
openssh-clients-3.7.1p1-1es4.i386.rpm
openssh-server-3.7.1p1-1es4.i386.rpm
openssl-0.9.6b-35.7.i386.rpm
perl-CGI-3.00-3.i386.rpm
perl-CGI-FormMagick-0.89-07.noarch.rpm
php-4.1.2-7.3.6es1.i386.rpm
php-imap-4.1.2-7.3.6es1.i386.rpm
php-ldap-4.1.2-7.3.6es1.i386.rpm
php-mysql-4.1.2-7.3.6es1.i386.rpm
phpSysInfo-2.1-01es6.noarch.rpm (*** why? ***)
pine-4.44-19.73.0.i386.rpm
proftpd-1.2.9-es1.i386.rpm
unzip-5.50-11.i386.rpm

As we appear to be downgrading 'e-smith-lib' the above may be installed as
follows:
 
# /bin/rpm -Uvh --replacepkgs --oldpackage *.rpm
# /sbin/e-smith/signal-event post-upgrade
# /sbin/e-smith/signal-event reboot

Three questions from above:

1) Did I get this right?
2) e-smith-lib-1.14.0-07.noarch.rpm - curious as to why we are downgrading?
3) phpSysInfo-2.1-01es6.noarch.rpm - There appears no httpd.conf fragment in
the rpm to make this web accessible, so why is this a recommended upgrade?
I must be missing something :-)

Regards,

Darrell


--
Please report bugs to [email protected]
Please mail [email protected] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.