Re: Suggestion for SME...
Brad Hards <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:08:31 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.e-smith.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 20:46 pm, Klaus J. Mueller wrote: > Hm? For what I understand kolab would make a great extension to e-smith. The kolab implementation is very tightly tied to the concept of "everything in LDAP", while e-smith runs its own configuration database in Perl. > [Does someone have a link to a self definition of e-smith? I can't seem > to find one on e-smith.org. In case there is none yet: shouldn't we have > one? Otherwise we might find out that we all have very different ideas > of what e-smith actually is. This could mean that we're trying to run > into several directions at the same time - now that we can decide which > way to go] I see e-smith as the events/actions/templates core. Everything else is changeable. See http://www.e-smith.org/architecture/ and http://www.e-smith.org/concepts/ Compare that with http://www.kroupware.org/architecture-1.1/index.html > I think that the gateway functionality is just a minor part in the whole > concept. (BTW: I think that for security reasons this is the component > that should be the first one to be put on a different box in real world > scenarios - which should be the case for most installations anyway > (DSL-Routers...); it can be done very easily with another low end > box running e.g. http://fli4l.de/ (ISDN, DSL)) I tend to agree, except for my home network, where I want it all in one little (mini-ITX, say) box. > Extending the collaborative concept by a workgroup server would be a > great idea in my opinion. We could, instead of the kolab approach, try eGroupware - http://www.egroupware.org/ or another system > There should not be many components missing, anyway - should there? > > Brad: did I get you right here: there are some the fileserver bits > missing in e-smith? Or does that read "these are the parts that are > missing in Kolab" kolab has no fileserver (or gateway) functionality. The question is - would you rather add the groupware functionality to e-smith, or the fileserver functionality to kolab? Brad - -- http://lca2004.linux.org.au - I'm registered. Are you? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/1E2gGwwszQ/PZzgRAohyAJ92D2nDgTBSszeXxJjyZXaL3S1s4ACfY7LT O69yIKxYuRWucgh7AaHMLCY= =gEb6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Please report bugs to [email protected] Please mail [email protected] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [email protected] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org