Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)

Maybe, maybe not.

contribs.org is simply providing a central place with information about 
the (future) development. All this information is for 'free' and 
everybody can contribute and share this information.

Choosing any internal mechanisme is just another way of organising this 
information.

I guess if the majority of the community doesn't like the way 
contribs.org initially organises the information, it will provide 
sufficient feedback.

Regards,
Hsing-Foo

Charlie Brady wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote:
> 
> 
>>contribs.org is looking in to the most suiteable update mechachinsm.
> 
> 
> Shouldn't that be a public discussion?
> 
> --
> Charlie Brady                         [email protected]
> Mitel Networks Corporation      http://www.mitel.com/
> Phone: +1 (613) 592 5660 or 592 2122  Fax: +1 (613) 592 1175
> 
> A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
> Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
> 
> 


--
Please report bugs to [email protected]
Please mail [email protected] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org