Re: Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Greg Zartman wrote:

> getting done.  Please be assured that 95% of what's being discussed 
> off-list at this time is organizational in nature (e.g., how are we 
> going to move the lists, what bug tracking are we going to use, what's 
> our next move, how are we going to organize the troops, do we use 
> sourceforge or don't we, etc, etc.)

That's all as may be, Greg, but do remember that I started this thread by 
quoting Hsing-Foo:

> contribs.org is looking in to the most suiteable update mechachinsm.

The most suitable update mechanism for end-users is not an organisational 
issue at all, and I can't understand why "contribs.org" would be looking 
into it.

--
Charlie Brady                         [email protected]
Mitel Networks Corporation      http://www.mitel.com/
Phone: +1 (613) 592 5660 or 592 2122  Fax: +1 (613) 592 1175

A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?


--
Please report bugs to [email protected]
Please mail [email protected] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org