Re: Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)

> That's all as may be, Greg, but do remember that I started this thread by 
> quoting Hsing-Foo:
> 
>>contribs.org is looking in to the most suiteable update mechachinsm.
> 
> The most suitable update mechanism for end-users is not an organisational 
> issue at all, and I can't understand why "contribs.org" would be looking 
> into it.

Please feel free to share your thoughts and contributions on this 
matter. contribs.org is merely trying to create a starting point. If 
something better is requiered by the community I assume contribs.org 
will comply and do what it has always have been doing, serve the community.

Again, thanks for your involvement and interest in the upcomming GPL 
release.

Regards,
Hsing-Foo


--
Please report bugs to [email protected]
Please mail [email protected] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org