Re: Free Internet & IPv6
Arjuna Sathiaseelan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPaG1AmpqL117=Zc8KKoggJ=cDk7kpanm9hEs7jwbdTbQNsKBQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Ofcourse if you werent rate limited. regardd arjuna On Sep 20, 2012 4:24 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bandwidth (actually bitrate - bandwidth is a "classic error" too, as us radio guys continue to grit our teeth at the confusion...) is useless without adequately quick latency. > > > > Hence, it is unused so that low latency can be present when it is (suddenly and unpredictably) needed. > > > > When someone talks about "filling up bandwidth" - the only image that pops into mind is a completely clogged city road system (LA freeways during rush hour). Full utilization of pavement - must be the best of all possible worlds! > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Daniel Havey" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 9:20pm > To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Arjuna Sathiaseelan" <[email protected]>, "Jon Crowcroft" <[email protected]>, "<[email protected]>" < [email protected]> > Subject: Re: [e2e] Free Internet & IPv6 > > So those who purchase blocks of bandwidth may give N-P to the community if they choose? > > Hmmm, that is probably okay, but, N changes over time (diurnal cycle, etc.). When my N increases to near P then the community must drop off the link because the paying users are using it. > > This sounds a little like whitespace. > > ...Daniel > > > > --- On Wed, 9/19/12, Fred Baker (fred) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Fred Baker (fred) <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [e2e] Free Internet & IPv6 > > To: "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]> > > Cc: "Jon Crowcroft" <[email protected]>, "Arjuna Sathiaseelan" <[email protected]>, "<[email protected]>" < [email protected]> > > Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2012, 6:00 PM > > > > On Sep 19, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Daniel Havey wrote: > > > > > I wonder why the bandwidth is unused in the first > > place? > > > > The most common reason is related to the diurnal cycle. When > > everyone's asleep, only the backup tool is running. > > > > The one after that is that bandwidth is generally purchased > > (for money) in fixed increments. If I need N bps and my > > options are M and P, where M < N < P, I either accept > > being congested some percentage of the time and go with the > > lower value, or increase to the upper one. In the latter > > case, I never use P-N.