Re: Delivery Times .... was Re: Bandwidth, was: Re: Free Internet & IPv6
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 27.12.2012 00:01, schrieb [email protected]: > > In mobile networks (let's include wifi there) a packet is either > reliably delivered - in unpredictable time. > Or it is unreliably delivered - that is possible in predictable time. > > That is also true of wired networks. > Absolutely. However, in wired networks packet corruption is (hopefully) that rare, that the "unreliably delivered" packets are delivered "unreliably" with p_succ= 0.9999 or something similar. (Simply spoken: Corruption loss is typically ignored.) > > It is the fundamental constraint of packet networking. At any level, > one can decide to choose either case. Rather than "unpredictable", > one should say "unbounded stochastic". > E.g. in GPRS, the standard defines certain quantiles. E.g. for 1024 bytes, we have certain delay classes: mean 0.95 quantil 1.: < 2s < 7 2.: < 15s < 75s 3.: < 75s < 375s I don't now whether "mean" refers to "average value" or "median". Each class refers to some different sdu corruption probability. (I don't have the values in mind, may be 10^-3, 10^-5, 10^-9, however 10^-9 will ever be implemented.... ;-)) If you have a look at typical simulation systems, e.g. the NS-2, wireless interfaces are assigned a certain "rate". Which implicitly assumes a more or less stationary delay. Does that make sense? Particularly, as the extremely high latency 375 s most likely refers to some "countless" repetition of packets (100 times, 1000 times....), which may indicate a situation where we should rather choose a different interface or a different route if possible. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Detlef Bosau Galileistraße 30 70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031 mobile: +49 172 6819937 skype: detlef.bosau ICQ: 566129673 [email protected] http://www.detlef-bosau.de ------------------------------------------------------------------ The nonsense that passes for knowledge around wireless networking, even taught by "professors of networking" is appalling. It's the blind leading the blind. (D.P. Reed, 2012/12/25) ------------------------------------------------------------------