Re: Congestion control as a hot topic in IETF

Scott Brim <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.end2end
Message-ID <CAPv4CP84u26reRub72M2NvJTU=C9QLre39EBj2D_2xJ87dwEGg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Bob Braden <[email protected]> wrote:
> I hope that people of this E2E list are reading the current thread on the
> IETF list about choosing a
> new Transport Area director who is/is not an expert in congestion control.
> Some of you have
> been around long enough to recall the congestion collapse of the
> (NSF-sponsored) Internet, before
> Van J showed us how to not be stupid when he defined the basic TCP CC
> mechanism.  They/we
> invented the concept of "TCP Friendly" to try to head off a race to the
> bottom while providing
> an easy-to-understand criterion for acceptable CC.
>
> It seems like an interesting question for research to determine whether
> widespread adoption
> of some future transport protocol with an ill-advised or inadequate CC
> mechanism could still
> cause congestion collapse of  large areas of the Internet,or only local
> patches.  Or has
> that been researched and I missed it?
>
> Congestion control seems a bit like riding a unicycle -- even after you
> learn how to do it,
> you have to pay attention every moment or you are in danger of falling off.
>
> Bob Braden

Yup :-).  I was astounded at the "why is congestion control important"
question.  I'm holding back, not being an expert.  I hope he gets 30+
answers ... but so far it seems to have shut everyone up.

When I was for-profit I was told "nobody ever made money on the
control plane".  That could be the problem.

Scott
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.