Re: Congestion control as a hot topic in IETF
Scott Brim <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPv4CP84u26reRub72M2NvJTU=C9QLre39EBj2D_2xJ87dwEGg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Bob Braden <[email protected]> wrote: > I hope that people of this E2E list are reading the current thread on the > IETF list about choosing a > new Transport Area director who is/is not an expert in congestion control. > Some of you have > been around long enough to recall the congestion collapse of the > (NSF-sponsored) Internet, before > Van J showed us how to not be stupid when he defined the basic TCP CC > mechanism. They/we > invented the concept of "TCP Friendly" to try to head off a race to the > bottom while providing > an easy-to-understand criterion for acceptable CC. > > It seems like an interesting question for research to determine whether > widespread adoption > of some future transport protocol with an ill-advised or inadequate CC > mechanism could still > cause congestion collapse of large areas of the Internet,or only local > patches. Or has > that been researched and I missed it? > > Congestion control seems a bit like riding a unicycle -- even after you > learn how to do it, > you have to pay attention every moment or you are in danger of falling off. > > Bob Braden Yup :-). I was astounded at the "why is congestion control important" question. I'm holding back, not being an expert. I hope he gets 30+ answers ... but so far it seems to have shut everyone up. When I was for-profit I was told "nobody ever made money on the control plane". That could be the problem. Scott