Re: Congestion control as a hot topic in IETF

Detlef Bosau <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.end2end
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 08.03.2013 16:54, schrieb Jon Crowcroft:
> In missive <[email protected]>, Detlef Bosau typed:
>
>   >>> btw, path loss is very real (and not at the antennae)
>   
>   >>no.
>
>   >>Or can you tell me where the waves have gone? Where the energy has gone?
>
> this is physics #101 - if you transmit with some power level, and spread that over a distance, guess what, at a
> distance with a signal that is spreading out over a surface, the power level is lower

Good answer :-)

I see, you understood why the power level depends on the distance via a 
sqrt-Function :-)

And that means what?

Merely nothing. When I move around my laptop in my apartment, I use WLAN 
to access my DSL router, the power level will change.
However: Hardly that much that the packet corruption level is affected.

Unfortunately, in my appartment I see up to 8 (eight) WLANs.

So, what do you think affects my data rate notebook - router? Me moving 
around in the apartment or my neighbours surfing the Internet?

In addition, the SNR sinks continuously when moving around. The packet 
corruption ratio doesn't.

It is a theoretical game with numbers.
>
> eventually the signal (to background noise) is too low level to carry any info in any way distinguishable
>
>
>   >>Data corruption is a phenomenon which occurs at the receiver. The
>   >>problem is that the receiver cannot successfully rebuild a packet from
>   >>what he received. The air interface has no idea of which waves are
>   >>travelling along and whether they make any sense at all.
>
> you're confusing interference with other sources and misreading the honorably Dave Reed

I'm quite sure that I'm not misreading Dave Reed.


>
> secondly, you are ignoring absorption (e.g. by water vapour which gets a little bit hotter)
> and also _self_ interferance (aka Ricean fading) and scattering (rayleigh fading)
>   

So, a model which correctly describes wireless channels is that flexible 
that it fits anything - and has no use at all.

I don't think I misread Dave Reed - to the contrary, in some particular 
respects I share his anger.

Detlef

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30
70565 Stuttgart                            Tel.:   +49 711 5208031
                                            mobile: +49 172 6819937
                                            skype:     detlef.bosau
                                            ICQ:          566129673
[email protected]                     http://www.detlef-bosau.de
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.