Re: Why do we need congestion control?
LOCHIN Emmanuel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 02.04.2013 14:53, Detlef Bosau a écrit : > Am 02.04.2013 13:20, schrieb shun cai: > >> Hi, >> >> I found two papers which state that with ideal fountain code,there >> is generally no congestion collapse.Efficiency remains higher than >> 90% for most network topologiesas long as maximum source rates are >> less than link capacity by one or two orders of magnitude. Moreover, >> a simple fair drop policy enforcing fair sharing at flow level is >> sufficient to guarantee 100% efficiency in all cases. I refer to >> several papers on the congestion problem when fountain code is used. >> [1] [2] > Don't we compare peaches and oranges here? > > When we talk about TCP, we talk about a reliable protocol. Are > digital fountain codes reliable?? Hi Detlef In these papers the authors consider "perfect code", meaning that all the redundancy is useful. Look at our implementation of Decongestion Control Protocol : http://www.lochin.net/tetrysjungle.pdf where full reliability is achieved without retransmission. Manu