Re: Why do we need congestion control?

LOCHIN Emmanuel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.end2end
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le 02.04.2013 14:53, Detlef Bosau a écrit :
> Am 02.04.2013 13:20, schrieb shun cai:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found two papers which state that with ideal fountain code,there
>> is generally no congestion collapse.Efficiency remains higher than
>> 90% for most network topologiesas long as maximum source rates are
>> less than link capacity by one or two orders of magnitude. Moreover,
>> a simple fair drop policy enforcing fair sharing at flow level is
>> sufficient to guarantee 100% efficiency in all cases. I refer to
>> several papers on the congestion problem when fountain code is used.
>> [1] [2]
>  Don't we compare peaches and oranges here?
>
>  When we talk about TCP, we talk about a reliable protocol. Are
> digital fountain codes reliable??

Hi Detlef

In these papers the authors consider "perfect code", meaning that all 
the redundancy is useful.
Look at our implementation of Decongestion Control Protocol : 
http://www.lochin.net/tetrysjungle.pdf
where full reliability is achieved without retransmission.

Manu
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.