Re: Why was hop by hop flow control eventually abandonded?
Mark Handley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1374014873.23736.140661256474709.49B0CF90@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
It's before my time, but I'd always assumed it was also influenced by the NVP work, which would not have wanted hop-by-hop flow control. Mark On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 02:24 PM, Bob Braden wrote: > I believe that hop-by-hop flow control only works with per-flow state in > the routers (see X.25 for example). Once the decision was made that the > routers should be stateless, end-to-end flow control was the only > option. That is what the end-to-end principle is all about. > > Bob Braden >