Re: Why was hop by hop flow control eventually abandonded?
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 16.07.2013 23:24, schrieb Bob Braden:
> I believe that hop-by-hop flow control only works with per-flow state
> in the routers (see X.25 for example). Once the decision was made that
> the routers should be stateless, end-to-end flow control was the only
> option. That is what the end-to-end principle is all about.
>
> Bob Braden
>
Is this really the "end-to-end principle"?
To my understanding, Jerry Salzer indicated that it is an important
discussion whether a certain mechanism is placed on the communication
end points or somewhere along the path.
The Salzer paper is not primarily a "principle", it is more a "culture
of thorough thinking".
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30
70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031
mobile: +49 172 6819937
skype: detlef.bosau
ICQ: 566129673
[email protected] http://www.detlef-bosau.de