Re: TCP ex Machina
Joe Touch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
FWIW, I've been concerned about a number of proposed "extensions" to TCP, either to optimize it for DNS (TCP-CT) or for Google (various). My concern is because these optimizations sidestep my view of the primary goal of TCP as described below. Joe On 7/25/2013 2:00 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > > > On 7/21/2013 11:35 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: >> But I think maximizing throughput while minimizing the probability of >> loss is probably the holy grail. > > It also depends on whether you measure that as an individual or as a group. > > I tend to think of TCP as supporting the most participants having > reliable communication as a primary goal, and a secondary goal to > maximize (though not optimize) the aggregate data per unit time -- > subject to the primary goal. > > I.e., it's not about max BW for a given connection, and it also almost > never means minimizing the transfer time for a single connection. > > Joe