Re: TCP ex Machina

Joe Touch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.end2end
Message-ID <[email protected]>
FWIW, I've been concerned about a number of proposed "extensions" to 
TCP, either to optimize it for DNS (TCP-CT) or for Google (various).

My concern is because these optimizations sidestep my view of the 
primary goal of TCP as described below.

Joe

On 7/25/2013 2:00 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>
>
> On 7/21/2013 11:35 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>> But I think maximizing throughput while minimizing the probability of
>> loss is probably the holy grail.
>
> It also depends on whether you measure that as an individual or as a group.
>
> I tend to think of TCP as supporting the most participants having
> reliable communication as a primary goal, and a secondary goal to
> maximize (though not optimize) the aggregate data per unit time --
> subject to the primary goal.
>
> I.e., it's not about max BW for a given connection, and it also almost
> never means minimizing the transfer time for a single connection.
>
> Joe
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.