Re: TCP "experiments"
ashish makani <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEX1urj2U+2oBRhazt0=ZdfRbBpSMao9US4DC5UsAFJF75XWrg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Jon Crowcroft <[email protected]>wrote: > google have extremely good instrumentation - you need to go visit them > unfortunately, you'd have to sign NDAs but believe me, they know > what they are about a lot more than most academics and a whole lot of > other industry - some of the stuff is quite public too (lots of SPDY > testing is on their blogs and vairous public facing documents) > > > their shareholders would get upset if they deployed things that broke >> the world badly - that's the NSA's job. > > That's the NSA's job - lol :) True that Jon :) > > In missive <[email protected]>, Joe Touch typed: > > >> > >> > >>On 7/29/2013 2:53 PM, Jon Crowcroft wrote: > >>> In missive <[email protected]>, Joe Touch typed: > >>> > >>> >>My view has been that we need to protect the Internet for *when* > there > >>> >>is no more Google. I don't trust Google (or any company) to do > that. > >>> > >>> why do we trust you? > >> > >>You shouldn't. > >> > >>More specifically, "trust but verify". > >> > >>Un-instrumented changes are not verifiable. > >> > >>Joe > > cheers > > jon > >