Re: testing

Hi,

What percentage of those who bought a ticket to a show went on to discuss
this on a twitter or other social page later on?

A transport provider may agree to increase QoS (bandwidth share) for a
video streaming service (an end-to-end service) if it could include some
advertising material in real time from a third party (the result is a
none2e composed service).

Both scenarios show that a non-e2e service is required and gives value
added information or new business model.

My question is: can we think of interesting services that cannot be met by
e2e network operation? note that the scope is that of a networking.

Thanks,

Djamel





On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why should they be differentiated?  (I'm not denying that they could be,
> but "should" is a different matter).
>
>
>
> Also, I would suggest that when SDN's are used to balkanize networks, that
> has little to do with "internetworking".   Remember "internetworking" is
> different from "networking" in a fundamental way.  If you have any
> background in Abrahamic religions, the Tower of Babel is a relevant
> metaphor to think with (I use that only because I don't know if non
> Abrahamic religions have traditions that consider the many problems of
> non-interoperation as key issues).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, September 6, 2013 7:01am, "Djamel Sadok" <[email protected]>
> said:
>
>  > Hi,
> >
> > We could think that in the future we could have e2e subnets and non e2e
> > subnets such as ICNs living side by side sharing the same infra-structure
> > in a virtualized SDN world. Can we think of services that use one
> paradigm
> > or both?
> >
> > Djamel
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > please ignore
> > >
> >
>