Re: Is the end to end paradigm appropriate for congestion control?
Richard Bennett <[email protected]> Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:44:17 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The arithmetic on the size of bits on a network is pretty interesting. At 1 Mpbs, a bit is 300m long, at 1 Gbps it's .3m, etc. So those old ring systems never had more than one token circulating at a time, but I saw 100 presentations that showed several in the network at the same time. On 11/11/2013 11:19 PM, Jon Crowcroft wrote: > and of course, any LAN tech has to start receiveing bits before you > finish sending them.... (unless you choose the cambridge ring model > with 16 bit minipackets - a precursor to atm) -- Richard Bennett Visiting Fellow, American Enterprise Institute Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy Editor, High Tech Forum (408) 829-4944 (mobile) (415) 967-2900 (office)