Re: Question the other way round:
Neil Davies <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Nov 2013 21:58:44 +0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> >> But if you are building a datacenter (AWS) or an access network or a >> transport network, you build for the worst case, and expect it to happen >> rarely. The systems that depend on the network to actually work for >> people's needs never want a congested network, and don't actually want the >> network to operate at its local minimum cost/bit/sec. They want the >> network to never be in the way, and the cost they really care about is the >> cost of getting congested for the wrong reasons. I've been a the ITU jamboree in Bangkok this week - there is another question, when your country is hit by an earthquake and an tsunami - offered loads for telecoms systems go to 50x to 60x capacity. (http://www.itu.int/tlc/WORLD2013/forum/entries/session.1299.pdf) Those PhD corner cases are sounding more interesting now... Neil