Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:05:06 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think it was stated quite often already, but all these QoS concepts work pretty fine in wire line networks or in some well designed wireless point to point networks. As soon as any other wireless concepts come into play, you cannot even bridge the gap between net data rate and throughput Detlef Am 28.11.2013 06:17, schrieb [email protected]: >> Another issue is that QoS is often achieved at layer 2, hence most of >> the work is done at the ATM, cell relay, frame relay, MLPS .... level, >> is there really that much work done at the IP layer or higher? > In our case, QoS is normally configured at L3, at the network edge. > *Queuing* often takes place at L2 (MPLS) in the core of the network, > but there is of course also queuing at the edge. > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Detlef Bosau Galileistraße 30 70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031 mobile: +49 172 6819937 skype: detlef.bosau ICQ: 566129673 [email protected] http://www.detlef-bosau.de