Re: What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines

Admittedly, my position on this matter radically changed during the last
years.

However: TCP is an asynchronous protocol. So, if there are no other
reasons to avoid bursts, I don't see a problem
in bursty traffic.

Am 15.12.2013 06:35, schrieb Naeem Khademi:
> Hi all
>
> I'm not sure if this has already been covered in any of the other threads,
> but looking at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-aqm-5.pdfand
> draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-00, the question remains: "what is a
> good
> burst (size) that AQMs should allow?" and/or "how an AQM can have a notion
> of the right burst size?".
>
> and how "naturally-occuring bursts" mentioned in
> draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-00
> can be defined?
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Naeem


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30   
70565 Stuttgart                            Tel.:   +49 711 5208031
                                           mobile: +49 172 6819937
                                           skype:     detlef.bosau
                                           ICQ:          566129673
[email protected]                     http://www.detlef-bosau.de