Re: [aqm] What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines

Am 16.12.2013 18:30, schrieb Fred Baker (fred):


> I don't know that a sending transport (which is to be distinguished from the queueing arrangement
in that same system) or a receiving system *has* a definition of a
"good" or "bad" burst. The one is sending data, which in the context of
y two examples might be a good or bad idea, and the other is receiving
it. From the receiver's perspective, the data either arrived or it
didn't; if it arrived, there is no real argument for not delivering it
to its application...
>

Particularly, CoDel is full of magic numbers.

That's the reason of my doubts.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30   
70565 Stuttgart                            Tel.:   +49 711 5208031
                                           mobile: +49 172 6819937
                                           skype:     detlef.bosau
                                           ICQ:          566129673
[email protected]                     http://www.detlef-bosau.de