Re: Lost Layer?
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:50:42 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 11.01.2014 12:40, schrieb Jon Crowcroft: > In missive <[email protected]>, Detlef Bosau typed: > > >>I would like to discuss the talk > >>http://rina.tssg.org/docs/JohnDay-LostLayer120306.pdf > >>given by John Day. > >> > >>What do you think, e.g., of the claim > >>> • > >>> TCP was split in the Wrong Direction! > >>> • It is one layer, not two. > > should have been 3 - as per the transport services work - its clear Why 3? Why not 4? Or 40? Admittedly, sometimes I think CS guys are collecting layers just like others are collecting stamps. > you need a sublayer convergence (as per day's work) but also the > socket layer needs revising badly to allow for a wider set of > transport service semantics than came out of the fast > hack that bbn and berkeley did Shouldn't we agree upon a model and then upon offered services and APIs first? When I read John's talk, my impression was (and this is not only from John's talk), our current <small>TCP</small><big>IP</big> model is roughly spoken as follows. <tiny>TCP peer</tiny><HUGE BOLD LARGE>I P C L O U D</HUGE /BOLD /LARGE><tiny>TCP peer</tiny> And our current end to end excuse is: We only can control the TCP peers, there is a big fat IP cloud where we have absolutely no idea what's happening in there, so believe in a model instead and control this at the end points. In other words: We mix up the real IP cloud with an artificial model - and ignore that these are not really the same. And perhaps, that's what John wanted to say? (Which is sometimes a bit ardous, because John often talks extremely much about the Internet's history and where this company took the wrong road or when this institution took a wrong decision, this may be interesting and sometimes worthwhile to understand how things developed, however it is sometime not quite concise and we sometimes don't really see the forest for the trees here.) Actually, the more I think about it, I have a huge problem with this "IP cloud", because this metaphor withholds what's going on there and the end points are, and this is simple control theory, NO WAY adequate to control the mechanisms within a cloud of such complexity. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Detlef Bosau Galileistraße 30 70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031 mobile: +49 172 6819937 skype: detlef.bosau ICQ: 566129673 [email protected] http://www.detlef-bosau.de