Re: Lost Layer?
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:08:38 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 14.01.2014 16:29, schrieb Hamed Haddadi: > you may also like to have a look at this book chapter that covers some of > the trade-offs very well with respect to multihoming and IPv6 > Oh yeah. I don't know the situation abroad. But besides Jews, Illuminati and Freemasons, Germany's top conspiracy theories are 9/11 and IPv6. This even tops the landing in the desert in Nevada, which was sold as the landing on the moon..... ;-) Hamed, I want to talk about flow control and not about addressing. And my claim is, that - please wait for the second half of the sentence before putting me in your killfile - congestion control is questionable because (second half of the sentence) congestion control works around a missing flow control. And precisely this flow control layer is really missing in TCP. Perhaps, I make it into anybody's kill file here, however I considered this claim quite some years and quite carefully, and I would appreciate discussing it. And no, I don't want to discuss addressing issues in this context, because once a connection is established, the flow's endpoints are associated and the flow is in a state which is far beyond any addressing issues. Detlef