Re: Lost Layer?

Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:25:54 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.network.end2end
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 11.02.2014 16:10, schrieb Joe Touch:
>
>
> On 2/11/2014 5:41 AM, Detlef Bosau wrote:
>> Am 11.02.2014 03:31, schrieb Joe Touch:
> ...
>>> I have no idea what a 'network' layer is that is different from what
>>> we currently call the link layer.
>>
>> And you are not the only one to have this problem.
>>
>> When you have a look at
>> @article{cerf,
>> title={ Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication},
>> author={V.~ Cerf and R.~Kahn},
>> journal={IEEE Transactions on Communications},
>> month= "May",
>> year= "1974",
>> volume = "22",
>> number = "5",
>> pages = "637-- 648"
>> }
>
> At that time, the terminology was in flux.

Isn't it today?

And I well try to understand thins in their temporal context.

However, I think that an "entity" (not necessarily "layer") flow, as it
is known in multimedia architectures, is useful here.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30   
70565 Stuttgart                            Tel.:   +49 711 5208031
                                           mobile: +49 172 6819937
                                           skype:     detlef.bosau
                                           ICQ:          566129673
[email protected]                     http://www.detlef-bosau.de