Re: Lost Layer?
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:25:54 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 11.02.2014 16:10, schrieb Joe Touch:
>
>
> On 2/11/2014 5:41 AM, Detlef Bosau wrote:
>> Am 11.02.2014 03:31, schrieb Joe Touch:
> ...
>>> I have no idea what a 'network' layer is that is different from what
>>> we currently call the link layer.
>>
>> And you are not the only one to have this problem.
>>
>> When you have a look at
>> @article{cerf,
>> title={ Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication},
>> author={V.~ Cerf and R.~Kahn},
>> journal={IEEE Transactions on Communications},
>> month= "May",
>> year= "1974",
>> volume = "22",
>> number = "5",
>> pages = "637-- 648"
>> }
>
> At that time, the terminology was in flux.
Isn't it today?
And I well try to understand thins in their temporal context.
However, I think that an "entity" (not necessarily "layer") flow, as it
is known in multimedia architectures, is useful here.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30
70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031
mobile: +49 172 6819937
skype: detlef.bosau
ICQ: 566129673
[email protected] http://www.detlef-bosau.de