Re: Lost Layer?
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:59:08 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Organization | Brandenburg InternetWorking |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> PS - I disagree that the layer that's missing is the "AS" layer. > > If that's what you really want, then you get that using a recursive > network layer - e.g., LISP. Looking at this latest sequence of notes on this thread, I think that what's missing is any sort of summary problem statement, put into essentially non-technical, functional terms, without directing the answer. By non-technical, I don't mean anything as extreme as prohibiting reference to layers or the like, but that functional separation needs to be described in very basic terms, with an explanation of what major improvement is achieved by satisfying that need. For reference, "multi-homing" is an example of an appealing need, but it's too broad a concept. For example, host multi-homing versus net multi-homing is an important basic distinction. Similarly for mobility. The different styles of mobility can get solved in /very/ different ways, for different host functions. So it's important to clarify. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net