Re: lifetime record of a UDP packet ?
Theodore V Faber <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Mar 2017 21:26:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CY1PR09MB114795ADF7D8DC6EEA394A49B9250@CY1PR09MB1147.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/13/2017 02:21 PM, John Day wrote: > Shouldn=92t each layer should impose an upper bound on Maximum Packet > Lifetime? They can try. Seems to me that the E2E implies it won't always work... - -- = Ted Faber <[email protected]> Engineering Specialist Computer Systems Research Department The Aerospace Corporation 310-336-7373 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYxw5vAAoJEFNjQnOBW8uObAEP/1D5WptXevba/d907LYHcnut u9wyafvhLCFWMsBnFXtooYGwbSYjnZ+fxmvoRz35Vd0IrV8Ehzpr9uTC+uFCDedI Dy3V8FhsEwOjOOkZl2h2CAV54+ySJi7w3lgdHl2zoBR/QJC3B74roXXKNfiTZ/kW QiJA0hpXGznLaxuC+cMW3KLUdV7WEIkGFUlmJ5Hor+6/YOzPu5FzTmu44eevKdP7 +v+1oUwyraNVd9rkt05kdQGIiPJ89+MjMjHsMO/Z9tIIa8tIm1uHYEoa2MUDDbu8 9jFnJRJgafZnvNue431kTInTWJPWL87LTk+qCL4nzf1TRWfcTYNB5cOu2RV2h/DA IRYXJ1HLj0D/yCFNaK94+HDnsUJRAPliGLG4ceCYeyfncgkQTW9jQoytk05lpSTs n24NwuPSLDaFoZQZIw0kvw5hckrjyET0NS2nHA5xemexr4IC4QmphIMp372xPL2s Exx39Rc2WPmKcpuz5l8g8y9S4YI4LptLADuc19fTOOljV+Lc2Ar8RDqH5y8QkwSD ErHlQpdhGK5vihaaCpqhZ2parrJEUkCub4lnNoppaKM9RR+qx4g6x39uye9PgBjt Fa964Y/SvqQ6Jz0Z/MkqGpZgu77oUHGRjt/c4lBYFPIZy4OVBHTLvMy63dnybMzZ r9dyNjdxQDslnS6+bOEv =3D1Rrj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ end2end-interest mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/end2end-interest Contact [email protected] for assistance.