Re: [syslinux] Etherboot and gpxe

Joyce Yu wrote:
>>> I want to know if both implementations are working? What is the benefit
>>> if the new ones are used?

"working" is a relative term.  The native gPXE interface is better 
because it allow multiple NICs of the same type to be used and because 
it offers _much_ better performance, among other things.

Is there some particular reason you would want to use the legacy 
interface support in gPXE?  If it is because you don't want to do the 
work to convert to the new API you could probably find someone to help 
with that.  It's not really that hard, especially if you already have a 
working Etherboot-style driver.

We would oppose including a legacy interface driver in gPXE without a 
_really_ good reason.  If you have one, please let us know.

Marty



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july