Re: gpxe support for Intel 82567

"BENJAMIN LAKE DERSTINE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.etherboot.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for replying Thomas.   The reason I'm wanting to use gpxe is because it
allows me to statically assign an IP without having to use DHCP(which isn't
available in this context.)   Using the built-in pxe puts me back at being
dependent on DHCP.  I have been able to chainload gpxe from syslinux which
works with these NICs and allows static assignment but then the chainloaded
gpxe still needs its own NIC driver for network access so that doesn't really
get me anywhere.  So I'm trying to utilize gpxe in a situation where A; There's
no driver available for it and B; DHCP isn't available.   Maybe that just isn't
possible at this point in time.  Any other thoughts?

Ben

On Fri, Aug  7, 2009 11:19 AM, Thomas Miletich <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:28 PM, BENJAMIN LAKE DERSTINE<[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>  <snip>
>>  Any known workarounds?
>
>Hi,
>assuming the machines already have PXE support you can use
>chainloading: http://etherboot.org/wiki/pxechaining
>This workaround should be fine until gPXE has a native driver for these cards.
>
>- Thomas Miletich
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july

_______________________________________________
Etherboot-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/etherboot-discuss
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.