Re: Hook INT18 for IBM servers?
Michael Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.etherboot.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 24 August 2009 19:13:43 Jarrod Johnson wrote: > In short, the GIT change did allow gPXE to detect PnP capability, but > INT19 is still detected/used, and I'm pretty sure that is an accurate > assessment of IBM BIOS capabilities (PnP, but not BBS compliant). Thanks for testing this. I was waiting for an opportunity to get hold of an IBM to test against. I believe that most IBM BIOSes usually have some form of "recapture INT 19" option. If you use this, you should find that the BIOS overwrites the INT 19 value written by gPXE, which will prevent gPXE interfering with the boot process. You *should* then be able to select gPXE via whatever non-BBS-compliant boot device selection mechanism the BIOS provides. This is based only partly on memory; I may be wrong on some of the details. Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july