Re: Last 4 days fixes and the 1.0 release

Gerald,

SVN 18024 is very intrusive in the inner workings of tcp analysis code
  but it is required for the future tcp reassembly enhancements.

The code is much much easier to read than the old code and should be
much more efficient as an extra bonus.

Please consider for inclusion in the release branch since tcp
reassembly code updates are listed as subgoals for the 1.0 release.



On 4/26/06, Gerald Combs <[email protected]> wrote:
> ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> > Gerald,
> >
> > Can you add 18002 to the release branch?
> >
> > It is a very safe patch with very little risk of destabilizing the code.
> >
> > It fixes an issue where version 4 of NDMP has dropped a parameter for
> > two function calls   which resulted in these PDUs as showing up as
> > malformed in ethereal.
>
> Done.
>
> > I would eventually want to see the recent fc/fcp/iscsi/scsi changes in
> > a release version as well    but the changes made are quite extensive
> > and intrusive.
> > When 0.99 is out,   will you sync upp all changes from trunk to the
> > release branch   or will this happen after the 1.0 release?
> > (no urgency for me,   i just point my users to the buildbot builds
> > and that is fine for us)
>
> The only changes that should be copied from /trunk to /trunk-1.0 are bug
> fixes (including security fixes) and anything that achieves the
> milestones listed on the roadmap page.  Ulf asked if periodic developer
> releases could be created from the trunk.  Would that be sufficient?
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>