AW: [Patches] Wiretap support for Catapult DCT2000 .out files
Claudia Becker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.ethereal.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Martin, is it possible to get detailed information about the DCT2000 format? I'm especially interested in the time format. Is it possible to give each packet an absolute timestamp and not only a timestamp that is relative to the time in the second line of the file? Best regards Claudia Becker -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]Im Auftrag von Martin Mathieson Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. April 2006 19:14 An: Ethereal development Betreff: [Ethereal-dev] [Patches] Wiretap support for Catapult DCT2000 .out files Hi, This attached patch and new files provide support for Catapult DCT2000 .out files to wiretap and ethereal. This wiretap support (catapult_dct2000.c+h) appends a short header to each packet giving some context, and a corresponding ethereal dissector (packet-catapult-dct2000.c) parses this before passing the real payload onto an existing ethereal dissector (for ethernet, ip, lapd, ppp, frame-relay,...). For now, there is only support for saving dct2000 files in their own format, although I may add support for converting between dct2000 and libpcap later. I've also attached a short capture file (test.out) used to test each of the supported link-type protocols. I know some of these messages show as malformed (they are mostly taken from low-level protocol tests), but they are enough to illustrate/verify the mapping between DCT2000 protocols and ethereal dissectors. I've tested this with quite a few test files (I work at Catapult), and reading/writing/merging works well for me. I've also done some testing with mergecap and editcap (encap string is "dct2000") which seems to work. This is the first wiretap module I've added, so any comments/suggestions are very welcome. Best regards, Martin P.S. the diff file contains small, unrelated RTCP dissector changes, could these please be applied too...?