RE: Ethereal timings vs ping timings
"Visser, Martin" <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:48:53 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.ethereal.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <EDA6886713F7F94081284F78EEB0B1B0034B1C67@arvexc01.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net> |
I have seen this problem with the Windows ping in the past. The first ping always gives a very high response time compared to subsequent ones. ping MMM.NNN.50.1 PING MMM.NNN.50.1 (16.145.50.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from MMM.NNN.50.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=73 ms 64 bytes from MMM.NNN.50.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0 ms 64 bytes from MMM.NNN.50.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=1 ms 64 bytes from MMM.NNN.50.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=1 ms 64 bytes from MMM.NNN.50.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=0 ms ----MMM.NNN.50.1 PING Statistics---- 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/med = 0/15/73/1 I believe that is an internal Windows issue (something to do with the delay of loading the ICMP.dll) and not related to actual time-of-flight of the ICMP echo. When I have used windows ping in doing doing network analysis from scripts I either disregard the first response (or use another ping program!) Martin Visser Technology Consultant Consulting & Integration Technology Solutions Group - HP Services 410 Concord Road Rhodes NSW 2138 Australia Mobile: +61-411-254-513 Fax: +61-2-9022-1800 E-mail: martin.visserAThp.com This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify HP immediately by return email and then delete the email, destroy any printed copy and do not disclose or use the information in it. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anis BEN ABDALLAH Sent: Monday, 12 June 2006 8:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Ethereal-dev] Ethereal timings vs ping timings Hello, I'm testing an embedded ethernet device and when trying with the ping command, I have a different timings between reply timings indicated by the ping command in the dos window and timings indicated in the ethereal (time delta from previous packet) For example for the first reply I got "time = 9ms" in dos window while in ethereal I have "time delta from previous packet = 0.00055 s" Why this difference? Thanks for your help. Anis _______________________________________________ Ethereal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev