RE: Ethereal timings vs ping timings
Jaap Keuter <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:07:34 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.ethereal.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Don't forget that the ARP protocol is probably running before the first ICMP packet is sent out. Thanx, Jaap On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Visser, Martin wrote: > I have seen this problem with the Windows ping in the past. The first > ping always gives a very high response time compared to subsequent ones. > > ping MMM.NNN.50.1 > PING MMM.NNN.50.1 (16.145.50.1): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from MMM.NNN.50.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=73 ms > 64 bytes from MMM.NNN.50.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0 ms > 64 bytes from MMM.NNN.50.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=1 ms > 64 bytes from MMM.NNN.50.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=1 ms > 64 bytes from MMM.NNN.50.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=0 ms > > ----MMM.NNN.50.1 PING Statistics---- > 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/med = 0/15/73/1 > > I believe that is an internal Windows issue (something to do with the > delay of loading the ICMP.dll) and not related to actual time-of-flight > of the ICMP echo. > > When I have used windows ping in doing doing network analysis from > scripts I either disregard the first response (or use another ping > program!) > > > Martin Visser > > Technology Consultant > Consulting & Integration > Technology Solutions Group - HP Services > > 410 Concord Road > Rhodes NSW 2138 > Australia > > Mobile: +61-411-254-513 > Fax: +61-2-9022-1800 > E-mail: martin.visserAThp.com > > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of > the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is > confidential, proprietary or privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify HP immediately by return email and then delete > the email, destroy any printed copy and do not disclose or use the > information in it. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anis BEN > ABDALLAH > Sent: Monday, 12 June 2006 8:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Ethereal-dev] Ethereal timings vs ping timings > > Hello, > > I'm testing an embedded ethernet device and when trying with the ping > command, I have a different timings between reply timings indicated by > the ping command in the dos window and timings indicated in the ethereal > (time delta from previous packet) > > For example for the first reply I got "time = 9ms" in dos window while > in ethereal I have "time delta from previous packet = 0.00055 s" > > Why this difference? > > Thanks for your help. > > Anis > > _______________________________________________ > Ethereal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev > _______________________________________________ > Ethereal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev > >